Mobile Phones vs. Satellite Devices in Emergencies

Mobile Phones

  • Ubiquitous: Almost everyone carries a mobile phone.
  • Security: We rely on them for safety and emergency communication.
  • Limitations:
    • Network Overload: In large-scale emergencies (e.g., wildfires, disasters), calls may not go through due to overwhelmed cell towers.
    • Spotty Coverage: In remote or wilderness areas, cell service may be unreliable or nonexistent.
  • Tip: Text messages (SMS) use less data and are more likely to get through than voice calls during network congestion.

Satellite Communication Devices

  • Global Coverage: Work anywhere in the world, even in remote locations with no cell service.
  • Types:
    • Personal Locator Beacons (PLBs):
      • Send SOS messages.
      • No subscription required.
      • Strong signal, reliable in remote areas.
    • Satellite Messengers:
      • Send SOS messages.
      • Require a subscription.
      • Offer additional features like GPS navigation and two-way messaging.

Bottom Line

  • Mobile Phones: Best for everyday emergencies in areas with good cell coverage.
  • Satellite Devices: Essential for crisis scenarios, remote adventures, or anywhere cell service is unreliable.

Quick Tips

  • Know Your Location: Research cell coverage before heading out.
  • Text Over Call: In emergencies, try sending a text message if calls aren’t going through.
  • Consider a Satellite Device: If you frequently venture into remote or disaster-prone areas, invest in a satellite messenger or PLB.

Stay safe and prepared!